Although currently human developing antibiotic-resistant ...

How are we to Facebook

"saw this coming," said Lance Price Translational Genomics Research Institute, or TGen in Flagstaff, according to NPR. "The question is how strattera 25mg often this happens in the future unless we start to control the use of antibiotics?"

Use of antibiotics in animal feed is becoming more common in livestock feed to promote growth of animals and reduce the infection spread throughout the animals in an environment designed to facilitate mass production. However, wider use of these products leads to antibiotic strains of bacteria that developed in animals. "Excessive use of antibiotics in food animals for growth acceleration allows for different strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria," said Dr. Marcus Zervos, chief of infectious diseases at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, according to. "If we continue the use of antibiotics in food animals, especially for unnecessary reasons, infections become resistant to antibiotics and break into people."

Do not use antibiotics in livestock in 2006, the U.S. has failed to follow suit. "We havent adopted this approach in the U.S., but I think that Europe is more than we," Zervos said. "Its not just tonnage of antibiotics we use here, but we also use all major classes of antibiotics used in food animals used in humans and it is not like any Theres a trend in the reduction of unnecessary use."

According to the American Society for Microbiology, half of all meat, selected U.S. Commerce Department, contains "pig MRSA" strain, said. Although in general can be removed when preparing meat adequatelty, the risk of infection can still occur at hazardous processing methods, especially when it comes into contact with other products. This question has long caused controversy, with the use of antibiotics in animal fiercely defended the U.S. meat industry. Indeed

published American Meat Institute directly denies any connection between the use of antibiotics in animals and antibiotic resistance in humans. "There is a misconception that somehow eating the meat of animals that received antibiotics cause people to become resistant to these antibiotics. It is simply not the case, "it said. "Most knowledgeable scientists and public health professionals recognize that the problem of resistance to antibiotics in humans, in most matters related to the use of antibiotics man."

Currently, 80 percent of all antibiotics in the U.S. is on the animals. Although currently human developing antibiotic-resistant strains in the part of the Netherlands is responsible for up to one in four cases of MRSA in humans, according to NPR. Food and Drug Administration, responsible for regulation of these practices was indecisive on the issue. Last December, FDA withdrew the proposal, which has since 1977, limiting the use of antibiotics in animal feed. This was despite the time that the new regulation does not mean that "FDA has no security concerns about the use of medical important antibiotics in food producing animals."

Despite the problems, FDA said that they later "to promote voluntary reform."

Shortly thereafter, showing a lack of confidence in how to handle the problem. FDA then made a partial concession to its policy last month when he ordered limit, using the type of antibiotics, cephalosporins, according to. To report problems or comment on this article by e-mail:

To contact the editor via email.